pwnt.be

Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 05:09 AM CET

“Broken Flowers”: 6/10. You could call it “open to interpretation” or “thought-provoking,” but I wouldn’t give you my vote. It wouldn’t feel right if I gave a movie that doesn’t have any profoundness as such, intentional as it may be, a good rating. I mean, there’s plenty of stuff to think about without watching a movie. And if you’re going to get all explicitly philosophical all of a sudden, don’t go for a trite “The past is gone, the future isn’t here yet, so all we have is this.” Go back to your marijuana, hippie. Well, maybe I’m just missing the point. But this is my blog and my opinion.

Post a Comment

This contraption supports Gravatar, as well as Markdown with SmartyPants. If none of that made sense to you, feel free to ignore it and start typing.

  • :)
  • :D
  • ;)
  • :-O
  • :P
  • :@
  • :$
  • :S
  • :(
  • :'(
  • :|
  • :-#
  • 8-|
  • ^o)
  • :-*
  • +o(
  • :^)
  • *-)
  • 8-)
  • |-)
Disorientation
Continuity
Retributions
Automating OpenVPN Connection on Windows XP
blanky, sky, Tim, Geb, 12vpn, Tim, neecom
Simple Linear Regression with JFreeChart
Nicolas Machado, Sascha, Tim, Sascha, Tim, Sascha
De Canvascrack: een epiloog
Tim, Steven Noels
Lplayer for the Rest of Us
jesus2099, Tim, jesus2099, Tim, jesus2099, Tim, PixelPirate
Proximus, Universiteit Gent, Kafka: schrappen wat niet past
Tim, Bart Coppens, Tim, Steven, Tim, Femke
Colophonics